![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Epic Tolkien Bookclub: Week Three
Epic Tolkien Bookclub: Week Three (The Hobbit)
Chapter V: Riddles in the Dark
Chapter VI: Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire
Rules
I very much doubt we'll require much in the way of formal rules, but just for the sake of formality and clarity:
Chapter V: Riddles in the Dark
Chapter VI: Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire
Rules
I very much doubt we'll require much in the way of formal rules, but just for the sake of formality and clarity:
- Discussion is welcome and encouraged, as is disagreement. Name-calling and personal attacks will be punished by purchasing $10,000 worth of shares in Mordor Inc. in your name.
- There is no spoiler policy in place. Although we're reading the Hobbit, please feel free to bring in things from other Tolkien works, any of the films, the History of Middle Earth, the Letters of JRR Tolkien, and, if you should like, other literary sources.
- There is no such thing as too much geekery. Or taking the text too seriously.
- If you have any concerns at any point, I'm the closest thing this gong show has to a mod, so feel free to get in touch. I can be reached either by PM through this site, or directly by email at sigridhr.lokidottir@gmail.com.
no subject
Ok, well, that makes sense. Because I'd thought that he'd need a lot more worked out than I thought he'd had for this to work. I really, really need to get my hands on a copy of the annotated Hobbit. Really.
Yeah, I've found a lot more sympathy for Gollum in the past couple years. I definitely wonder where the line falls between Smeagol and Gollum in the books – Sam definitely delineates between Slinker and Stinker, but I do wonder if Bilbo didn't wake Smeagol up, in a sense, with the Riddles here. The movies certainly seem to imply it, at any right. But you're right, he's much subtler in the books.
no subject
The movies lean heavily on Smeagol here, but the book definitely doesn't. (Corey points out that while Gollum argues with himself, it isn't an argument between good and bad halves, it's an argument between the half that thinks he'll be able to get the ring back and the half that thinks it's hopeless.) Overall it's much more ambiguous in the books than it ever is in the movies; Gollum and Smeagol are both complex people, and neither of them are unaffected by the Ring.
The thing that breaks my heart now, that I don't think I noticed the first time through, is that Gandalf sent three eagles to Mount Doom.
no subject
I don't really consider Smeagol a clear-cut good half either though - (but I will agree that it's not a Smeagol/Gollum argument). After all Deagol's murder was committed by Smeagol, I think. They're both affected by the Ring, and both self-serving and calculating in their own ways.
The thing that breaks my heart now, that I don't think I noticed the first time through, is that Gandalf sent three eagles to Mount Doom.
I'm not crying, I've just been cutting onions. I'm making a lasagna for one.
no subject
no subject
OMG sorry but LET ME LOVE YOU with your Flight of the Conchords references!
no subject